Hello, no,  you don't need to apologise, there was nothing wrong at all. The point is that by adding the additional information the entry is a bit better. The problem is that other editors seem to have liitle idea of the damage they do in when they remove such information, it was fear of that being done which led us to leave the entry short. Look at the entry for Dougray Scott in this programme, it's very good but a poor editor will reduce it to the bare basics and render it bland and uninteresting.

Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.